PDA

View Full Version : GPU PPD a reference list



Blacksmith1
07-03-2011, 04:40 AM
What I would like is for everyone to list their GPU type
overclocks if any (N/A if stock)
and Approximate PPD for that card


example;
nvida 8800 gt
Core-xxx
Shader-xxxx
Mem-xxxx
9zillion ppd
I'd like to put together a reference list for anyone interested in upping their points, so that they can tell about what they can expect from any given card. not just the new ones, because some will get used cards to add to their arsenal. (like I did)
this will be done alphabetically then numerically.
Memory amounts are not listed due to the fact that the amount of memory on a card doesn't affect the PPD.
All core, mem, and shader clocks are in Mhz.
Shader clocks affect the PPD greatly, this is due to the fact that the GPU uses the Shader Proccessors to do the work. turning them up will increase the PPD. Memory clocks seem to have no affect on PPD. Core clocks have very little effect on PPD and turning them down for folding will keep the card cooler.
Use these settings as a guidline, but remember not all cards of the same type will be stable at the same clocks. and not all cards will perform the same in different systems. differences in other hardware can and will affect how fast the cards can fold.
PPD are +/-, taken at a random point based on what the user saw at that time. your mileage may vary.
Please remember that the PPD varies from one work unit to the next, and PPD shown during a work unit, and the total points for the day, WILL be different.

ATI

4650 Stock clocks PPD-800

AMD 5870 2gbs Stock clocks 8500 ppd

NVIDIA

Quadro FX3700 core-500 mem-800 shader ---- 3000+ > 3500 PPD

Quadro FX5600 core-600 mem-800 5000 ppd

8800GT core-600 mem-700 shader-1720 PPD-4200+ > 5400+

8800GTS core-670 mem-972 shader-1890 PPD-4700+ > 6400+

8800gtx core-576 mem-900 shader-1350 PPD- 5300

9600GSO core-600 mem-799 shader-1782 PPD-4200+ > 4400+

9800 GT core-601 mem-900 Shader-1512 PPD-4700+

9800gtx core-675 mem-1100 Shader-1688 PPD-5200+

9800gx2 core-601 mem1000 Shader-1602 (both cores) PPD- 5700+ each core, 11400+ total

GTS 250 Stock clocks PPD-6600+

GT 240 core-550 mem-790 shader-1340 PPD 3700

GTX 260 core-691 mem-1107 Shader-1512 PPD-8400+

GTX 280 core-601 mem-1107 Shader-1512 PPD-8700+

GTX 285 core-648 mem-1476 shader-1242 PPD 8000

GTX295 stock clocks 15,000+ PPD

GTX 460 core-675 mem-1800 shader-1350 PPD 11900

GTX 460 core-751 mem-1800 shader-1502 PPD-10,000+ > 13,000+

GTX 460 core-768 mem-1900 shader-1526 PPD-10,000+ > 14,000+

GTX 470 core-625 mem-1701 shader-1250 PPD-12,000+

GTX 480 core-800 mem-1848 shader-1600 PPD-21,000+ (new 80xx WU's)

GTX 560oc core-924 mem-2004 shader-1848 PPD 10,000+ , 13,000+ with new 80xx WU's

GTX 560Ti core-900 mem-2004 shader-1800 PPD-around 12k (reeeeal accurate James... ) 13,000+ based on big @$$ picture.

GTX 570 core-806 mem-2002 shader-1612 PPD-17,000+

GTX 580 core-850 mem-2002 shader-1700 PPD-18,000+

James86
07-03-2011, 05:25 AM
My 560Ti
core-900Mhz
mem-2004
shader-1800
PPD-around 12k

swmeek
07-03-2011, 04:38 PM
470 gtx
core clock 625
shader clock 1250
memory clock 1701
ppd 12,050 (what it shows for today)
9800 gtx
core clock 675
shader clock 1688
memory clock 1100
ppd 5218 (what it shows for today )

James86
07-03-2011, 05:45 PM
here's a more specific pic for ya Black
13,083.4 PPD
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/748/folding560ti.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/96/folding560ti.jpg/)

Blacksmith1
07-03-2011, 06:05 PM
thanks, but just the # would have sufficed

James86
07-03-2011, 07:34 PM
gotta be thorough

Blacksmith1
07-03-2011, 07:49 PM
Shoulda dug this out for the first post... where is it... oh, here it is....:nospam: ;-)

James86
07-03-2011, 10:41 PM
me spam???
my 4650 does 830 PPD on stock clocks

Joshua_Mahr
07-05-2011, 06:33 PM
GTX570
Core:806
Mem:2002
Shad: 1612
Proj 6901 17,215ppd (averaged)

GTX580
C0re : 850
Mem:2002
Shad: 1700
Proj 6901 18,354 ppd (averaged)

thebluebumblebee
07-05-2011, 11:42 PM
Clocks (c/s/m) 787 783 587 *494 450 353 912 925 1280 1298 1348
8800GTS/512 670/1890/972 5811 5882 5966 4795 5634 6489
8800GT/256 600/1720/700 4533 5048 5071 4225 4628 5446
9600GSO/384 600/1782/799 4276 4421 4488 3744 4272 4420
GTX460/768 751/1502/1800 13,585 13,100 10,000 10,100 10,400

* not positive what the clocks were

sifter
07-06-2011, 02:26 AM
GTX 460/1GB (768 was the same, so my numbers are basically the same as the thebluebumblebee) Stock (768/1900/1526) 11 zillion ppd ..er 10-14k

Backup:
GTS250 Stock 6.6k ppd

Blacksmith1
07-06-2011, 04:50 AM
Ok one of you has a typo or bumblebee has his mem setting under clocked. assuming yours isn't a factory overclocked card. if it is then it's a differnt model and we need to know that.
and the reason I asked for the layout as
Core
mem
shader
was so that I didn't have to guess which was which. even in a different order as long as they are labled I can tell which one I'm looking at.

thebluebumblebee
07-06-2011, 05:11 AM
Ok one of you has a typo or bumblebee has his mem setting under clocked. assuming yours isn't a factory overclocked card. if it is then it's a differnt model and we need to know that.
and the reason I asked for the layout as
Core
mem
shader
was so that I didn't have to guess which was which. even in a different order as long as they are labled I can tell which one I'm looking at.

Sorry, fixed the memory number for the GTX460. My info is from an Excel SS that I setup a long time ago, and I have the listings as core/shader/memory. GPU-z listed the memory as 900 and it just didn't register that it was wrong. MSI SOC Twin Frozr

Blacksmith1
07-06-2011, 05:46 AM
It may not have been wrong, it reads the actual clocks not the settings. it is what found the down clock on several gt200 gpu's for me recently when the ppd suddenly dropped for no aparent reason. the card/driver may have downclocked the mem due to it not being utilized. tho it's moe likely that if the other clocks were correct it was misreading it.
thanks for the correction. still not sure about sifters order. yours was clear just that # was way out of whack with his #'s. based on yours i'm gonna guess that the 1900 is his mem, I'll fix it later if I'm wrong

thebluebumblebee
07-06-2011, 06:17 AM
It may not have been wrong, it reads the actual clocks not the settings. it is what found the down clock on several gt200 gpu's for me recently when the ppd suddenly dropped for no aparent reason. the card/driver may have downclocked the mem due to it not being utilized. tho it's moe likely that if the other clocks were correct it was misreading it.
thanks for the correction. still not sure about sifters order. yours was clear just that # was way out of whack with his #'s. based on yours i'm gonna guess that the 1900 is his mem, I'll fix it later if I'm wrong
I'm quite sure that is the case. He listed it in the order you requested. The other thing is that with the 4xx series, you can't separate the core and shader clocks and I think that the shaders run at twice the core clock. So if anything, his shader clocks should be 1536

Blacksmith1
07-06-2011, 06:22 AM
the unlock in afterburner won't let you separate the sliders? I wonder if that's hardware or driver based.....
thanks for that I went to look at the list and realized i coy/pasted yours for the layout and neve put his #'s in. it's fixed now. if he posts that his shader clock needs to be changed I'l do it, till then It stays as he posted it.

sifter
07-06-2011, 02:39 PM
Sorry for the confusion. The card is a slight factory over clock. I did do my numbers in order, but I see why its confusing...

Evga GTX 460/1GB SC (Factory overclock)
Core 763MHz
Memory 1900
Shader 1526MHz (26 is correct)

Yea for some reason Nvidia locked the shader with the core so you can't separate them.

Blacksmith1
03-26-2012, 10:07 PM
I updated the info on the Fermis in my rig to refelct the point increase for the new 80xx Work Units. anyone else have updated info, or any info at all for ATI/AMD cards? I only have one lonely 4000 series listed up there....:keepfolding:

gstillman-Stephanie
03-30-2012, 07:22 PM
Catching up a bit, and now running the latest V7 FAHControl.

Office System:
Quadro FX3700 (about 4 years old or so)
core clock 500
shader clock ???
memory clock 800
ppd 3000 to 3500

Home:
CPU: 980x base clocks as Asus Motherboard will not overclock reliably. Using both smp and gpu folding.
MSI GT470
core clock 607
shader clock 1215
memory clock 1800
ppd ~15000 to 16000

Blacksmith1
03-31-2012, 04:31 AM
Can you pause the SMP long enough to get me an estimate on the GPU PPD?

brokenwave
04-02-2012, 08:39 PM
what about ati card? and 680?

Blacksmith1
04-02-2012, 08:43 PM
As I understand it the 680's suck at folding right now. Nvida and Stanford are working on this. As for ATI/AMD I have had one person submit results. Since I am unwilling to just make up #'s I have to wait till some one supplies this data.

Pablo 54
04-09-2012, 11:36 PM
8800 gtx: Cc=576;mc=900;sc=1350 ~ ppd 5300
gtx 285: Gc=648;mc=1242;pc=1476 ~ ppd 8000
gt 240: Gc=550;mc=790;pc=1340 ~ ppd 3700
gtx 460: Gc=675;pc=1350;mc=1800 ~ ppd 11900

brokenwave
05-25-2012, 04:05 AM
amd 5870 2gbs no oc around 8500 ppd

brokenwave
06-08-2012, 10:47 PM
Quadro FX5600 core-600 mem-800 5000 ppd avg

brokenwave
06-28-2012, 01:27 AM
Quadro FX3800 core-600 mem-800 5800 ppd

swmeek
07-04-2012, 02:42 AM
MY 680 should be on it's way sometime soon.
Hopefully it shipped today!

Blacksmith1
07-05-2012, 02:37 PM
I would love to add those #'s meek. So please don't forget to post them.

swmeek
07-05-2012, 11:32 PM
Well it's not supposed to arrive until the 10th so we'll have to wait and see what happens then.
Plus how would I figure out an average ppd for this card.
I know I could just write down what it shows in the tracker but that doesn't always show the correct number of points.

Blacksmith1
07-06-2012, 04:41 AM
use GPU tracker or FAHMON which now works with the V7 client.

swmeek
07-06-2012, 07:15 PM
okey dokey

swmeek
07-15-2012, 01:00 PM
Evidently the 680 doesn't like the gpu3 clients as I let it run all night and it never even made any progress on it.
Guess I'll nosey around the FAH forums and see if I can find something.
I'll give the V7 client a try and see what happens.
For some reason it doesn't seem to be working on it either and it shows the card being identified properly which was an issue with previous versions.
Okay I dd some digging around and finally got it to work with the tracker program.
I'll post a link to the thread I found it at here in the forums so anybody else having problems Folding on a Kepler based GPU can see if it helps them out.