PDA

View Full Version : NVIDIA Quad-SLI vs. ATI Crossfire


Bio-Hazard
05-01-2006, 02:01 AM
A extremely interesting read along with some very interest results when you think about it being 2 GPU's against 4 GPU's, the 2 GPU's even wins a round or 2............

" At this year's CeBIT the most controversial and most debated new hardware (http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/QuadSLI/1#) was NVIDIA's Quad-SLI, which was awarded "best product of CES" earlier this year. By now everybody should know about SLI which combines the rendering power (http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/QuadSLI/1#) of two video cards to achieve greater performance, or better image quality through higher Anti-Aliasing Levels. The logical evolution of this dual solution is using four GPUs. However, since there are no chipsets/motherboards which support PCI-E x16 on four slots, NVIDIA had to come up with a way to make their idea happen.

In the past we have seen dual GPU solutions on one PCB (http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/QuadSLI/1#) from manufacturers like Gigabyte or ASUS. But these were just GeForce 6600 designs which were not using such complex PCBs. The 7900 GTX is the biggest and baddest NVIDIA card around, of course it has a completely different range of requirements when it comes to power and signal stability.
So putting two GPUs on one PCB was out. The clever people at NVIDIA worked up a rather simple but ingenious solution - just stack two video cards (http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/QuadSLI/1#), let them use only one slot connector and interconnect (http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/QuadSLI/1#) them with an own PCI-E bus. Each card has a little bridge device on it which connects the second card to the main PCI-E slot into which the card is plugged."

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/QuadSLI/1

z3r0C00L
05-01-2006, 03:37 PM
Quad SLI it completely worthless...

Even when it beats out the ATi x1900 Crossfire rig it's only by like 5 FPS. And it even loses in many instances.

Quad SLI also takes up all you motherboard space. Which limits the useage of an Agea Physx or Creative X-Fi sound card.

Meh.

Kougar
05-01-2006, 04:07 PM
Hm, I posted a similar thread but as it's slightly different I'll leave sitting over in the Nvidia subforum. X-Bit labs has done some benchmarking and testing of Quad-SLI...

Can read more about it here. Just read the paragraph in italics for a good summary though ;) http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=2051 (http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=2051)

mousiness
05-01-2006, 09:03 PM
Quad SLI it completely worthless...

Even when it beats out the ATi x1900 Crossfire rig it's only by like 5 FPS. And it even loses in many instances.

Quad SLI also takes up all you motherboard space. Which limits the useage of an Agea Physx or Creative X-Fi sound card.

Meh.

VERY TRUE.... at least until they make amaizing quad sli cards, i think quad sli is nothing more than a complete spoof, throwing rich custoners completely off about what it really is, after all rich people know nothing about pcs :P

Johnie
05-02-2006, 01:25 AM
Exactly! Its worthless...at least for now....because it only "shines" @ 2560x1600 (and even there not as it should!)...which is something majority (at least I) dont really need atm...:p :twisted: ...and at a time when such resolutions will become something every 2nd user will have....then this Quad SLI will be so obsolete that it will be good enough only for playing Tetris...:mrgreen: :-D ;)