View Full Version : Am I Lucky Or Is Value Select Just Good?
hailscott
05-18-2006, 05:27 AM
Hey i got a 1 gb kit of crosair value select ram and i can get my ram up to 240fsb with HTT@4x 1:1 ratio and timmings of 2.5-3-3-7. is that just luck or just good ram?
http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/2866/mem2407qv.png
http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/827/fsb2453sc.png
Kougar
05-18-2006, 05:41 AM
While AMD overclocking is not within my experiences, I believe that is less "luck" and more "DRAM:FSB Ratio" :D
I am not sure how to read a "CPU/11" setting though, but as everyone here uses AMD systems they can answer that. ;) Should be the same principle as Intel's memory divider ratios of 1:1, 3:2, 5:4, etc.
werty316
05-18-2006, 05:45 AM
I think you hit a jackpot and got lucky. Most valuse select sticks aren't known for good overclocking memory.
The DRAM:FSB Ratio is just the ratio of the memory compared to the CPU multiplier, sort of. Basically it is a "CPU/11" or 11/11 becuase his CPU uses a "11x" multiplier.
My A64 uses a "9x" multiplier and so if I ran my CPU and memory 1:1 my "DRAM:FSB Ratio" would be "CPU/9" of "9/9".
Lets look at how I have it now:
Basically: its (9/11)*200HTT= 163MHz which is the speed of the memory using a 166MHz(5/6) memory divider.
http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/9647/clipboard016nw1.jpg
More indepth:
CPU is a 3000+ @ 1.8GHz with "9x" cpu mutiplier.
Memory is set to "166MHz" or 5/6 divider in the bios.
So it works like this:
Divisor = CPU Clock Speed / (BIOS Divider * Reference Clock/HTT)
= 1800MHz/ (5/6 * 200)
= 10.8
Memory Clock = CPU Clock Speed / Integer Divisor
= 1800MHz/10.8
= 166
166MHz is what the memory should be set to.
Its easier using the HTT ratio to the 166/133/100 memory dividers.
Bio-Hazard
05-18-2006, 06:22 AM
2.5-3-3-7 at 240 HTT for 512 sticks is just about average these days for AMD systems. I have a set of PQI Turbo that will do up to 275 HTT at those same timings.
http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/8462/superpi9lt.jpg
These are the fastest timings I can get with my OCZ 2x512 dual channel kit.
http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/918/ramspeed1ez.jpg
werty316
05-18-2006, 06:25 AM
Must be TCCD and BH-5 chips.
I have a Patriot XBLK kit I got upto 275MHz @ 2.5-3-3-7 also; gotta love those TCCD chips ;); too bad there aren't TCCD 2GB kits :(
Bio-Hazard
05-18-2006, 06:31 AM
2 gig kits have slightly looser timings, but that's to be expected. Overall performance on a AMD system isn't all that much different between the 1 gig and 2 gig kits when all is said and done though.
2 gig SuperPi times.
http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/6746/superpi2meg6hx.jpg
1 gig SuperPi times.
http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/8462/superpi9lt.jpg
werty316
05-18-2006, 06:33 AM
Yeah but going from 2.5-3-3-7 @ 275MHz to 3-4-4-8 @ 275Mhz sucks but isn't noticable when gaming. 2GBs in FEAR and GRAW improved alot. I haven't tried Oblivion and Codemned yet.
Bio-Hazard
05-18-2006, 06:35 AM
Must be TCCD and BH-5 chips.
I have a Patriot XBLK kit I got upto 275MHz @ 2.5-3-3-7 also; gotta love those TCCD chips ;); too bad there aren't TCCD 2GB kits :(You're 100% correct...............
I just love those BH-5 sticks for bench marking, but TCCD are pretty good also when setup right.
Kougar
05-18-2006, 06:43 AM
Holy... that's just impressive considering what my 865PE chipset is capable of doing with high performance memory. Even thought the 875P chipset was a step up in that department, Intel had better be working on an integrated memory controller on Nathan...
werty316
05-18-2006, 07:01 PM
Heres the max I had my 2GB UCCC kit at so far @ 2.65V:
http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/1246/corsair285mhz3448265v1ob.th.jpg (http://img139.imageshack.us/my.php?image=corsair285mhz3448265v1ob.jpg)
Unfortunately I don't have any screen shots of my TCCD kit but no biggie since I don't use them.
Bio-Hazard
05-18-2006, 08:54 PM
Boy I wish my 2 gig kit would clock that high, I'd be in heaven...............;)
I still switch out my ram from time to time depending on if I want to do some special benchmarks.
werty316
05-18-2006, 09:14 PM
Can you get them anyhigher than 250Mhz using 3-4-4-8 timings? What chips do you OCZ use? I am thinking they use UCCC also.
Sad thing is I have to run them at 2T in order to get them to 230MHz or higher as my crappy Asus board has a 1T bug.
Bio-Hazard
05-18-2006, 11:54 PM
I can get them to 3-3-2-8 1T at 250 MHz, but that's it. It doesn't matter how much voltage I give them or what timings I try, nothing works. But I guess they aren't all that bad. As far as I can tell, the OCZ uses Micron IC's.
hailscott
05-20-2006, 03:32 AM
well prime failed in a half hour@240, but it was stable @235 for 8 hours. 3d mark 05 ran stable @235 also but not @ 240(failed the cpu tests). but im still happy with that. But i also rarley overclock. i just read the oc forum and try a few things. just to see what it can do on air cooling.
werty316
05-20-2006, 04:07 AM
You could alwats use a memory divider if the memory is the battleneck of your OC.
hailscott
05-22-2006, 02:44 AM
okay i have a question. Is it okay to overclock my HTT bus from 1000 to 1175 if it runs stable?
http://img445.imageshack.us/img445/3848/everestcpuid2tp.png
werty316
05-22-2006, 04:25 AM
Yep having a 1200MHz HT is usually the limit. Even if you have it at lets say 800MHz it won't matter as the latency is low that it doens't affect performance at all.
vBulletin® v3.7.0 Release Candidate 3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.