PDA

View Full Version : New LCD Technology Outperforms CRT


Kougar
06-14-2006, 08:37 PM
eCinema says it has a true CRT replacement


LCD panels have traditionally been lagging behind CRT monitors in terms of color response, saturation, accuracy and overall black-level response. Because LCDs are "always lit" by a backlight, deep dark blacks have been the Achilles heel of LCD technology. However, a company named eCinema Systems has announced a new LCD technology that it claims surpasses CRT in virtually every respect.

eCinema's new LCD technology is being called high dynamic range LCD, and also supports "deep color", which is higher than 24-bit color, starting at 30-bit or 36-bit and can go up to 48-bit. The new panels are able to display 36-bit color (12-bits per color channel), and 1000 to 4000 step gray-scales, producing fantastic gradients. Most LCDs today produce only 256 gray steps at most. This new "deep color" technology will be standard with the new HDMI 1.3 specification. What's most spectacular about eCinema's LCD display however, is its contrast ratio: 30,000:1. At this rating, eCinema's new DCM40HDR panel can achieve black levels that even CRTs cannot match.

...eCinema will be launching its new DCM40HDR 40-inch LCD by Q4 of this year.

Link: http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=2860 (http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=2860)

Gray
06-14-2006, 11:21 PM
Very interesting. I wonder if you are still stuck in a "native resolution"
Forking out all the dough to be limited like that stinks.

Also even in the comments below that article (not to mention the article itself) there were no Response times mentioned. Not a problem for looking at photos but, well need I say any more?

I would realy like to see one in action.

Kougar
06-15-2006, 12:54 AM
I agree... although from all the comments saying it was better in all areas over CRT, I naturally assumed that also included response times? Hmm

Gray
06-15-2006, 03:16 AM
Maby one day we will be saying that like the 75Mhz refresh rate of a CRT is un noticable to most people, we may now have a lower threshold for refresh times. lol.

mousiness
06-15-2006, 03:22 AM
didnt i say a few months ago that there would be an lcd breakthrough soon? :wink:

Gray
08-18-2006, 03:43 AM
[Quite]didnt i say a few months ago that there would be an lcd breakthrough soon? [/Quote]

I predict a breakthrough in some type of cancer in the near future.
We will have to wait and see...

Lets hope I am right to...

PP Mguire
08-18-2006, 05:20 AM
I actualy do hope your right and surpass your sarcasm. My gfs cousin just win in the hospital about 2 hours ago because of cancer :( Anywho, this seems awesome, and im sure if they say it outperforms a CRT in all aspecst im sure they mean in response too.

Vaerilis
08-18-2006, 02:30 PM
The problems of native resolution and not low enough response times remain.
An eCinema screen might be good for watching movies, but not for gaming (especially in lower resolutions, like in an emulator such as Dosbox). I guess I'm waiting a few more years for the real breakthrough in LCD (or OLED) technology.

nam-ng
08-18-2006, 07:20 PM
The problems of native resolution and not low enough response times remain.
What's wrong with native resolution and not low enough response time?
An eCinema screen might be good for watching movies, but not for gaming (especially in lower resolutions, like in an emulator such as Dosbox). I guess I'm waiting a few more years for the real breakthrough in LCD (or OLED) technology.
I myself fully expected it to be superior to CRT especially for gaming.

Vaerilis
08-21-2006, 01:59 PM
What's wrong with native resolution and not low enough response time?

Well, I use my CRT at the following resolutions:
640x480 (Dosbox)
800x600 (Playing games I can't afford to play at higher reslutions)
1024x768 (Browsing the internet)
1152x864 (Gaming)
1280x720, 1600x900 (Watching HD movies)
Would all these resolutions look fine on an LCD?
I couldn't afford a rig capable of playing everything at the native resolution of 1600x1200 or 1920x1200 most decent LCD displays have (the aspect ratio of 5:4 is just not right, 4:3 and 16:10 are much better looking).

Regarding response times: I'm yet to see an LCD suitable for gamers (at an affordable price, say, 500-600$). Even most of the recently released 8ms/4ms displays show some blurring or have poor image quality (TN panels...).