It's actually a AMD 555 dual core unlocked to a quad core
Printable View
It's actually a AMD 555 dual core unlocked to a quad core
That makes more sense. What is your 06 score? About 13/15k?
dunno I'll dl and run it
Make sure to put the score in the 06 thread :)Quote:
Originally Posted by James86
with my new 560 installed
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/1...0tivantage.jpg
I dont understand my score....???? It gave me a zero..!!!! I thought i had a decent rig.. Can someone help me understand what happened, or did i do something wrong...
http://i53.tinypic.com/o5cpeh.jpg
http://i56.tinypic.com/2zjkwgh.jpg
http://i51.tinypic.com/14ukyhl.jpg
http://i53.tinypic.com/2m3ny1y.jpg
http://i51.tinypic.com/2dhg1gz.jpg
Hope the pics shed some light... please help me... Thanks!!!!!
Maybe this can help (see posts #3 and #4):
http://getsatisfaction.com/futuremar...ti_video_cards
Based on what said there by a guy from FutureMark, it seems like you're getting a score of 0 because the benchmark run was not done with default settings.
In addition, maybe your 990x CPU is not being recognized properly?!?!?!
Hope this helps...
Keep us updated. ;-)
1920 x 1080 is not an official benchmark setting. It is kind of stupid why the older benchmarks did not take into account other resolution types, but the HD types of resolutions (16:9 Ratio) did not get popular till after Vantage was made, well actually up until a year an half ago for us computer types, the most common resolution was 1920x1200, 1600x1050, 1440x900 (the 16:10 ratios) back when vantage was made.
but your scores look real good, try 3Dmark 11
nice but now run it with out physx
No point when nobody runs it without physx.
Posted a score in the 3DMark 11 thread as well with some more info on my latest updated, but specs are in my signature. P63110
Attachment 2746
lol at Ken... that's his name right?