Hehe n00b? I didnt see you getting those scores before your 8800 hehe :) But yea, its at 2.66ghz right now like the sig says ;) I got what 1018. pwn.Quote:
ewww noob
whats ur cpu at? mine at 2.4 got 950 i believe, the 3500+
Printable View
Hehe n00b? I didnt see you getting those scores before your 8800 hehe :) But yea, its at 2.66ghz right now like the sig says ;) I got what 1018. pwn.Quote:
ewww noob
whats ur cpu at? mine at 2.4 got 950 i believe, the 3500+
ur 7950 > my 6800
my 8800 > your 7950
pop in ur X2 and we'll have a showdown once u sli :D
I dont think i am. But i havent decided. I dont have the money in hand yet and when i do ill make a decision.
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...=0&UID=9596891
7948 everything stock
Here's my UPDATED score, after overclocking my E6600 to 3.26GHz (362.5 x 9):
10835 Pts :grin:
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...=0&UID=9599958
And that with my 8800GTX running @stock, as I CAN'T overclock it under VISTA...:frown:
Anyway knows a way to overclock it under Vista (without having to flash a different BIOS) except ATITools, which SHOULD WORK under Vista, but somehow, DOESN'T work for me...:frown:
EDIT/UPDATE:
I found out that nVidia nTune is working properly for me under Vista, so I just overclocked my 8800GTX a bit to 600/2000 (instead of 576/1800 at stock) and here's the new 3DMark06 Score I got:
11264 Pts
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...=0&UID=9600855
Woohoo, I passed the 11K barrier! :grin:
My ist 3D Mark 2006 run. Score :- 5147
http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...=0&UID=9604796
sushrukh, why is ur CPU score so low? mine at 2.0ghz was 1400, and now at 2.4ghz is at 1800.
yours would surely be atleast 14/1500
my friend with a PD 934 3.2ghz got 1500
The A64 has better architecture and clock for clock your A64 X2 3800+ is faster than a Pentium D 820.Quote:
Originally Posted by darkorb
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkorb
Ya, Athlon 64 X2s are better as has been said.Inbuilt memory controller works very good for them too.I'll try to replace it with a C2D as well in future.
And a PD 934 & every 9 series PD has 4MB of L2 cache & they are built on 65nm technology while my 8 series PD has 2MB & 90nm manufacturing process.That's the reason why he has got 1500.
EDIT :- I don't think there's an PD called 934.It should be 930 or 935 or 940.
wooops sry, 935*
This is on my old Abit IN9 32x max board.. It sucked with my quadcore. But, now that I have an XFX 680i LT board, its been smooth sailing since.. That score was on air cooled cards on a water cooled minor overclocked QX6700. I have since purchased a vapochill unit and watercooling my vid cards.. I should easily be close to 18,000.
http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e2...mark06-3-2.jpg
http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e2...mark06-3-1.jpg
http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e2...3dmark06-3.jpg
That's a pretty high score for the GTS cards.
I might have to reinstall 3D Mark 06 again and try it at my mac OC........;) Just to see what I can get out of this old old video card.
3DMark Score5670 3DMarkshttp://service.futuremark.com/images/1x1pix.gifSM 2.0 Score2213 Markshttp://service.futuremark.com/images/1x1pix.gifSM 3.0 Score2184 Markshttp://service.futuremark.com/images/1x1pix.gifCPU Score2764 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1514548
14096 !!!!
I can now run easily at 3.5GHz on my e4300.
I think I just had forgoten to disable a few spread spectrum.
Thats the noobiest thing I ever did...
vcore of 1.55 vdimm 2.1 timings 4 4 4 12 on some cheap corsair value.
I think i'm going to try and go higher then 3.5 since 1.55v is pretty high.
I know at 1.6v someone managed to get to 3.7 unstable on air (well it was an engeneering sample but anyways !!
I'll let you guys know.
But i'm scared that my PSU won't support me anymore :p
14626
e4300 @ 3.7GHz @ Vcore 1.6v