Im gettin a Maximus II Formula with a Q9550, and i didnt spend a dime on it. It was a play toy to keep me occupied for a bit.
Printable View
Im gettin a Maximus II Formula with a Q9550, and i didnt spend a dime on it. It was a play toy to keep me occupied for a bit.
Lol thats up to your wallet. :lol:
Well here it is 3dMark06 sli: 17358 :icon_tiphat:
[IMG]http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/1...0766nc6.th.jpghttp://img503.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif[/IMG]
I actualy get a better score running 144x900. Take a look and see
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v7...k/Am241440.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v7...hmark/AM23.jpg
I just got one of the 9800GTX+ in for the FarCry nightmare, I'm seeing some strange results on it too.
Runs faster at some higher resolution is some tests. You can imagine the fun I had rerunning those tests and tracking down confirmation.
At lower resolutions Graphics are more CPU intensive, the CPU is chugging to keep up. Moving to higher resolutions it's more GPU intensive. In your case I'd say that's what your seeing.
That's from reading about 5 or 6 sites opinions on low vs high resolutions. Think I stumbled across it on 3dgameman.
You where right this card eats AA and high res for breakfast.
Does decent until you hit 1920x1200 then fades pretty good. DX10 that resolution cards are hard pressed.
My little setup at 1920 x 1200................;)
http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/1...03dmarkuw2.jpg
Finally broke out the 3DM06 on my system heres what I got.
http://i265.photobucket.com/albums/i..._182/3dm06.jpg
Heres with these stats:
Q9550 @ 3.55
ram @ 1397 6-6-6-16
4850 @ 700 core/ 1103 mem
http://i265.photobucket.com/albums/i...82/3dm06-1.jpg
You would get alot higher if you canned the BS in the background.
well....
my 3DMark Score is 17329
two nvG90GTS_320MegaBytes@oc_614/1434/900 with lots of lines running :) :) :)
crysis makes lots of fun only with pathing ;)