Quote Originally Posted by CDsDontBurn View Post
But soda and ice cream just make you fat
That was the idea lol.

Quote Originally Posted by ET3D View Post
I have no problem with single player games which are just 2 hours long. I just don't expect to pay much for them. $1 per hour is good value IMO, but I don't think that even $5 per hour is bad -- it's certainly on par with other forms of entertainment.
Except almost any game being released is 60 bucks. I don't want to pay 60 for a SP game that only has 10 hours worth of gameplay. It's sad enough that I completed the main story of AC3 in less than 10 hours. I also did quite a few side missions as well.

Quote Originally Posted by Goliath182 View Post
I guess I have a different perspective. I normally only get time in bunches so its nice to be able to complete a game in 10 hours. Though the Uncharted series was excellent and I wish it was longer, by them making it shorter it makes it so I can easily complete a whole game in a short period of time.
There is such thing as going back to the game; that is why they invented saves. Anyways, it's attitudes like this why we pay a high premium for so little in gameplay. Developers cram pack all of it in graphics but as of lately there hasn't been much innovation on the graphics side of things either. Biggest example here would be CoD.