Breaking News
Home » Reviews & Articles » Hardware » FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB

FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB

Have you ever heard of the saying “Speed Kills!” Not when it comes to video cards, speed is good. This is definitely one card that is pushing the limits of your FPS fantasies. Can it beat out its 128MB kin? Take a look at the FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB review and find out for yourself.

Introduction


Recently, at Bjorn3d we have had the opportunity to take a look at some of the latest cards based on ATI’s Radeon technology. So far we have not been let down by their performance. The cards have shown that they are definite contenders in the highly competitive PC graphics market. Our latest look into the Radeon family is the FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB. How does this card with its extra memory stack up with its 128MB brethren? Follow me as I take a look at this awesome card from FIC!

I think the main question that we want to be answer with this review will be, “Does the extra memory really increase performance?” I know we have all heard that there really isn’t that many opportunities for a graphics card to utilize all 256MB of memory it has available. Hopefully, we can help shed some light on this subject with some straightforward numbers. Before we get to that though, lets take a look at the specs for this card from FIC.

Specifications

Graphics Engine:ATI Radeon 9800 Pro
Video Memory:256MB DDRII
Core/Memory Clock380MHz/340MHz
Memory Interface:256 bit
Maximum 3D Resolution:2048x1536x75Hz
Advanced 3D FeaturesSMOOTHVISIONTM 2.0
TRUFORMTM 2.0
SMARTHEADERTM 2.0
HYPER ZTM III
VIDEOSHADERTM
Bus Type:AGP 8x or 4x Compatible
Display Support:CRT
DVI-I
TV-out
Dual Display
API SupportDirectX 9.0
OpenGL

The packaging for the FIC card is fairly typical for a high end graphics card. Of course, it is also much too large for what is actually found in the box. I think that graphics companies need to follow suit with the video game companies and compress their packaging to reduce waste.


Card strong like bull!

Back of FIC box

Bundle contents somewhat lacking

Included video connections

Unfortunately, you will not find much more than the video card inside this large box. I would tell you about the included bundle, but it is non-existent. This is always disappointing to a consumer. After spending close to a full paycheck on a video card, you hope to have some included software to take it for a test drive. Even something that you could benchmark the card with would be a nice addition to this package. Of course it does come with a VGA to DVI connector, molex power extension, an S-Video and component cable, and drivers CD. This still does not make up for the lack of a software bundle.

When you look at the Radeon line of cards, there really isn’t that much “flair” or “pizzazz” to them. The FIC card is no exception. The basic red board with a small and simple cooling solution is very subdued and plain. You could compare this card to a Geo Metro with a Corvette engine in it. Not flashy on the outside, but a speed demon lies within.


Nothing too flashy

Heatsinks anyone?

Red color, a classic for Radeons

Simple is sometimes a good thing

The extra 128MB of memory on this card stands out all over the card. For each memory chip, a small silver heatsink makes an appearance on the surface of the card. Sixteen little silver heatsinks, 16MB per heatsink, that’s a cool 256MB of memory cooking up some graphics goodness. The weight of the card is considerable due to the additional heatsinks on the card. Overall, the weight of the card is still comparable to most high-end graphics cards because of its very simple and smaller cooling solution.

Of course a standard feature on many of the more powerful video cards on the market is the molex power connection on the end to feed this beast. Many of the card manufacturers today are recommending a very strong power supply to satisfy the hunger that these new cards have.


Bottom dominated by memory heatsinks

These cards should be green, because they really GO!

Power connection on end of FIC card

Feed Me!


Testing


Well, we know what the card looks like, but what you really want to know is how it runs. We here at Bjorn3D put the FIC 9800 Pro 256MB through our usual collection of tests to see what this card can really do.

Before we jump in head first, why don’t we take a look at what we are using to put this card to the test.

Test System:

  • Motherboard: MSI 865PE NEO2-FIS2R
  • Processor: Intel Pentium 4 2.4GHz “C” 800MHz FSB (provided by EnvisionCS.net)
  • Memory: Corsair TWINX1024-4000 (2x512MB 500MHz DDR)
  • Hard Drive: Maxtor DiamondMax Plus9 Ultra w/ 8MB Buffer
  • Optical Drive: Plextor PlexWriter 12/10/32A
  • Video Card: Visiontek Radeon 9800 Pro or MSI 5900
  • Power Supply: Kingwin KWI-450WABK 450W

Motherboard / BIOS Settings:

  • FSB: 800MHz
  • Memory Speed: 400MHz
  • HyperThreading: Enabled
  • Performance: Fast (PAT disabled)
  • Dynamic Overclocking: Disabled
  • Memory Timings: 2-4-4-7

Video Card Drivers:

  • ATi Drivers: Catalyst 3.6
  • NVIDIA Drivers: Detonator 45.23
  • DirectX Version: 9.0b

In our latest efforts to add a little zest to the average everyday benchmarks you see on all the reviews, we have tried a couple of newer game titles. Of course we like to stick with the staples such as 3DMark and UT2003, but check out the scores on the Nascar 2003 and Command & Conquer: Generals. These tests add some variety to help base an overall opinion on the card.

3DMark2001SE — NoAA, NoAF

1024×768 – NoAA / NoAF
Video Card
3DMarks
FIC 9800 Pro 256MB15871
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB15447
MSI GFFX 590013978

3DMark2001SE — 4xAA, 8xAF

1024×768 – 4xAA / 8xAF
Video Card
3DMarks
FIC 9800 Pro 256MB11863
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB11645
MSI GFFX 590010605

Right off the bat the FIC Radeon begins to strut its stuff keeping right on par and higher than the 128MB VisionTek card, and begins to pull away from the MSI FX 5900.

Unreal Tournament 2003 — Asbestos

1024×768 – NoAA / NoAF
Video Card
FPS (avg)
FIC 9800 Pro 256MB79.23
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB76.49
MSI GFFX 590076.30
1280×1024 – NoAA / NoAF
FIC 9800 Pro 256MB78.88
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB68.22
MSI GFFX 590067.55
1600×1200 – NoAA / NoAF
FIC 9800 Pro 256MB78.97
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB76.51
MSI GFFX 590075.59

Unreal Tournament 2003 — Antalus

1024×768 – NoAA / NoAF
Video Card
FPS (avg)
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB54.62
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB55.63
MSI GFFX 590051.93
1280×1024 – NoAA / NoAF
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB56.61
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB57.13
MSI GFFX 590053.22
1600×1200 – NoAA / NoAF
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB53.51
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128mb54.18
MSI GFFX 590051.14

Unreal Tournament 2003 — Asbestos

1024×768 – 4xAA / 8xAF
Video Card
FPS (avg)
FIC 9800 Pro 256MB77.73
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB76.11
MSI GFFX 590072.81
1280×1024 – 4xAA / 8xAF
FIC 9800 Pro 256MB62.34
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB42.28
MSI GFFX 590044.79
1600×1200 – 4xAA / 8xAF
FIC 9800 Pro 256MB56.82
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB43.20
MSI GFFX 590039.81

Unreal Tournament 2003 — Antalus

1024×768 – 4xAA / 8xAF
Video Card
FPS (avg)
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB54.20
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB55.00
MSI GFFX 590048.51
1280×1024 – 4xAA / 8xAF
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB47.35
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB45.39
MSI GFFX 590036.37
1600×1200 – 4xAA / 8xAF
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB33.52
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB30.52
MSI GFFX 590023.29

The card continues to perform to expectations throughout the UT2003 tests. The 256MB FIC card stays pretty even with the 128MB Radeon through the testing. The extra memory does not seem to be putting it into a completely new category by itself though. The card is not performing extraordinarily better than the other two cards.


Testing Continued


Well, so far there really is not that much of a difference showing up between the 128MB Radeon card, and the 256MB FIC Radeon 9800 Pro. The scores are relatively on par with each other, only a few FPS and 3DMarks separating the two. The FX5900 from MSI continues to be left behind in the tests, finishing on the tail end of the benchmarks.

I was not surprised to see such a small margin, if any, of difference between the Radeon cards. The card does not have the opportunity to take full advantage of the extra memory that it has. With a few small exceptions, performance has been basically the same between the top two cards.

How will the FIC Radeon 9800 Pro continue to stand up to the competition? Don’t stop now, there’s still more just a scroll wheel click away.

Codecreatures Benchmark Pro

– NoAA / NoAF
Video Card
Official Score
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB3758
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB3638
MSI GFFX 59003461

Gunmetal Benchmark 1

1024×768 – 4xAA / noAF
Video Card
FPS (avg)
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB27.26
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB25.47
MSI GFFX 590024.46
1280×1024 – 4xAA / noAF
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB21.36
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB20.38
MSI GFFX 590019.83
1600×1200 – 4xAA / noAF
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB17.18
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB16.31
MSI GFFX 590015.70

Papyrus NASCAR 2003 Demo

1024×768 – NoAA / NoAF
Video Card
FPS (avg)
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB37.04
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB38.04
MSI GFFX 590034.34
1280×1024 – NoAA / NoAF
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB36.58
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB36.97
MSI GFFX 590033.53
1600×1200 – NoAA / NoAF
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB35.52
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB35.62
MSI GFFX 590031.86

Papyrus NASCAR 2003 Demo

1024×768 – 4xAA / 8xAF
Video Card
FPS (avg)
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB37.49
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB38.28
MSI GFFX 590028.83
1280×1024 – 4xAA / 8xAF
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB33.6
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB32.77
MSI GFFX 590023.56
1600×1200 – 4xAA / 8xAF
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB26.86
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB25.76
MSI GFFX 590017.47

3DMark2003 (Build 330)

1024×768 – NoAA / NoAF
Video Card
3DMarks
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB5589
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB5433
MSI GFFX 59005284

3DMark2003 (Build 330)

1024×768 – 4xAA / 8xAF
Video Card
3DMarks
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB3032
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB2641
MSI GFFX 59003003

C&C Generals (Version 1.0)

1024×768 – NoAA / NoAF
Video Card
FPS (avg)
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB29.71
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB29.88
MSI GFFX 590028.25
1280×960 – NoAA / NoAF
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB28.95
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB29.85
MSI GFFX 590027.71
1600×1200 – NoAA / NoAF
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB29.75
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB29.66
MSI GFFX 590026.51

C&C Generals (Version 1.0)

1024×768 – 4xAA / 8xAF
Video Card
FPS (avg)
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB27.66
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB27.42
MSI GFFX 590024.72
1280×960 – 4xAA / 8xAF
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB22.16
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB21.85
MSI GFFX 590022.10
1600×1200 – 4xAA / 8xAF
FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB16.16
VisionTek 9800 Pro 128MB16.23
MSI GFFX 590017.39

Yes, I know that you are thinking the same thing I am right now. The numbers continue to tell the same story. Not only is the 256MB card from FIC not beating out the 128MB card, it’s actually falling behind it in several of the tests. It has not shown me anything above and beyond its competitors.


Playability


I went ahead and did some game testing with this card just to see how it handles the average gaming session. Well, as expected it handled everything I threw at it quite nicely. The image quality is top-notch on the Radeon card. High resolutions with AA and AF cranked up just make this card more of a joy to have. This is how games should be played. The difference between my older FX 5200 or Ti4200 is remarkable to say the least.

One test that I like to run with a new video card is simply to play the high resolution Windows Media video clips that are offered on Microsoft’s website. These videos are HIGH RESOLUTION and take a lot of juice from both the processor and the video card. The files are huge so you might want to spare some time to download them. I have run these videos on my FX 5200, and my Ti4200 and experienced very low framerates and completely unviewable conditions with these clips. Crank them up using the FIC Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB and they run smooth as silk. I was really impressed with the video quality that this card gave me with these clips. If you have not had the opportunity to stress out your system lately, I definitely recommend taking these vids for a test run.

Final Thoughts


Well to put it lightly, this card is burn rubber fast no doubt. The performance is the best of the best. Quiet operation, and unbelievable speed make this easily one of the fastest on the market. Now the question is whether or not it is worth spending nearly an extra $150-$200 for 128MB of RAM. I would say it really isn’t worth it at this point. The numbers tell the story. Performance gains are minimal at most. I have had the opportunity to play games and work with both a 256MB and a 128MB Radeon 9800 Pro and the difference is not noticeable in everyday use. I think that most enthusiasts looking for a high performance card can save an extra $180 and go for the FIC A98P with only the 128MB of RAM.

Final Score


Performance
10
Find me a card that is faster and performs better, then I’ll change my score. Until then, this card is king in the way of brute power!
Features
9
Simple and quiet cooling system helps keep your sanity intact. Relatively compact size that takes up only one slot on the motherboard is also a plus. The subdued looks of the card may turn off some, but less is more in this case.
Bundle
6
Lacking to say the least. If you spend around $500 on a card, the least that could be included would be one game or piece of software to test out the card with.
Price
6
Is it worth the extra dough for the 128MB of extra memory, in my opinion no. Such a steep price difference between the two is the major downfall of this card. Around $180 will get the extra 128MB, or can buy you several other components to add to your system. The scales seem off-balance to me in this situation.
Final Score: 7.5This is an amazing card that blows away the competition. Unfortunately it blows away your bank account with not a whole lot of extras to begin to justify the price.


Check Also

Cover

Papago! GoSafe S30 Dashcam

For a great number of years we have been entertained on TV by dashcam footage …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: