Thursday , 24 July 2014
Latest Reviews
Home » Reviews & Articles » Hardware » Sapphire Radeon X300SE HyperMemory & Leadtek WinFast PX6200 TC TDH

Sapphire Radeon X300SE HyperMemory & Leadtek WinFast PX6200 TC TDH

Read this article to learn a little about Sapphire’s X300SE HyperMemory card and Leadtek’s 6200 TurboCache card. Both use system memory to increase the amount of memory used by the video card. Take a look at some benchmark charts to see which technology edges out the other or if they provide equivalent gaming experiences.

[review_ad]INTRODUCTION


To make a respectable profit in the video card industry, a company cannot rely on its flagship cards to bring in high margins. Instead, a graphics card company must produce mid-level and low-end cards that will sell in big lots to OEMs. That’s where the big money is. Several months ago, ATI and NVIDIA decided to spice up the low-end segment with their HyperMemory and TurboCache technologies, respectively.

To put it simply, these two technologies use system memory for graphics processing. Rather than just using the RAM embedded on a HyperMemory or TurboCache card, these cards also use up to a pre-determined amount of your system’s RAM. Both technologies store and access graphics data in the system memory to provide a less expensive way to get more overall video RAM. Companies would have liked to do this earlier, but the AGP interface wasn’t quite up to the task. The PCI Express interface, on the other hand, is fast enough to make it a reality.

With both HyperMemory and TurboCache, the card comes with a certain (typically small) amount of on-board memory, say 32MB. The card can then scale up to a defined level of total memory by using system RAM. ATI’s HyperMemory cards come in two variations: the 128MB HyperMemory version features 32MB VRAM on board, and the 256MB HyperMemory version has 128MB VRAM on board. NVIDIA has so far chosen three different configurations of TurboCache cards: the 128MB TurboCache version has either 16MB or 32MB of local memory, and the 256MB version sports 64MB.

The two cards I’ll be comparing in this review are the Sapphire Radeon X300SE 128MB HyperMemory and the Leadtek WinFast PX6200 TC TDH, a TurboCache card supporting 256MB of total memory.

  

Read on to see how well Leadtek’s knight performs compared to Sapphire’s little alien guy.

$$ FIND THE BEST PRICES FOR THE Leadtek PX6200 TC TDH @ PRICEGRABBER $$

$$ FIND THE BEST PRICES FOR THE Sapphire X300SE 128MB HyperMemory @ PRICEGRABBER $$

SAPPHIRE X300SE 128MB HM – FEATURES & BUNDLE


Features

  • 128 of HyperMemory
  • *128MB version is equipped with 32MB of Onboard VRAM
  • PCI Express x16 lane native support
  • S-Video TV-out port
  • Full support for DirectX® OpenGL® functionality
  • SMARTSHADER HD technology
  • SMOOTHVISION HD technology
  • Unique VIDEOSHADER HD engine uses programmable pixel shaders to accelerate video processing and provide better-looking visuals
  • HYPER Z HD is optimized for performance at high display resolutions, including widescreen HDTV resolutions.

Bundle

  • X300SE HyperMemory Card
  • CD-ROM with Drivers and Online Documentation
  • Composite-to-S-video Adapter
  • Case Sticker

The Sapphire X300SE 128MB HyperMemory card comes in the smallest video card box I’ve ever seen. I’m against excessive packaging so I actually appreciate the minimalist approach that Sapphire took for packaging this card. As you can see, the card doesn’t come with many “extras.” It’s a rather spartan affair, but that’s what you should expect from the low-end offerings.

The card itself is passively cooled and features a regular VGA out port, a DVI out port and a TV-out S-video connector. Obviously, without a fan, this card will be absolutely silent. Additionally, the card is quite small. These two facts make it a great HTPC card but only if high-end gaming isn’t desired.

$$ FIND THE BEST PRICES FOR THE Sapphire X300SE 128MB HyperMemory @ PRICEGRABBER $$

LEADTEK PX6200 TC TDH – FEATURES & BUNDLE


Features

  • Best-in-class features at value prices!
  • New price/performance for first graphics upgrade
  • TurboCache™
  • 64MB onboard VRAM
  • Features to the entry segement
    • Direct 9.0c Shader Model 3.0
    • UltraShadow II
    • Consumer Electronics Video
    • NVIDIA® PureVideo technology
  • PCI – SIG certified
  • Video-editing software bundle (WinDVD 5.0, WinFox II, Muvee)
  • Click here to see the specifications for this card

Bundle

  • WinFast PX6200 TC TDH Video Card
  • General Guide
  • Quick Installation Guide
  • DVI-to-VGA Adapter
  • HDTV Cable
  • Driver and Utilities CD-ROM
    • DVD Player (WinDVD 5.0)
    • WinFox II
    • Cult 3D
    • Coloreal Embedded
    • Coloreal Visual
    • Coloreal Bright
    • Muvee AutoProducer 3

Leadtek’s WinFast PX6200 TC TDH is also in a small box, but not quite as diminutive as Sapphire’s. Not only is the PX6200′s box bigger, but its bundle is bigger too. Although its a low-end card, Leadtek still throws in its typical bundled utilities, including WinFox II.

Just like the X300SE HyperMemory, the Leadtek card is passively cooled and therefore silent. Continuing with the “bigger theme,” the PX6200 is bigger and heavier than the X300SE. The PX6200 features a VGA port, DVI port and HDTV-out connector. This is also a good candidate for a HTPC video card.

$$ FIND THE BEST PRICES FOR THE Leadtek PX6200 TC TDH @ PRICEGRABBER $$

TEST SYSTEM & BENCHMARKS


The test system is based on the nForce4 SLI platform. The motherboard I used is the DFI LANParty NF4 SLI-DR, and the processor is an Athlon 64 3200+, which runs at 2.0GHz. Here is a complete look at my test system, followed by a list of the benchmarks I used to compare the two cards.

Test System

  • AMD Athlon 64 3200+
  • DFI LANParty NF4 SLI-DR Motherboard (review)
  • Corsair TWINX1024-3200XL (review)
  • Video Card 1: Sapphire Radeon X300SE 128MB HyperMemory – DirectX 9.0c, Catalyst 5.3
  • Video Card 2: Leadtek WinFast PX6200 TC TDH – DirectX 9.0c, ForceWare 71.89
  • Maxtor 120GB Serial ATA 7200RPM Hard Drive
  • Windows XP with Service Pack 2
  • 17″ Solarism LCD Monitor – max resolution 1280 x 1024

Benchmarks

  • 3DMark03 v3.6.0 – default settings
  • AquaMark3 – NoAA / NoAF, high quality
  • Half-Life 2 – NoAA / 2xAF
  • Doom 3 1.1 – various settings
  • X2: The Threat, Rolling Demo – automatic quality set in benchmark with bumpmaps and shadows enabled in benchmark; anti-aliasing on or off as indicated

$$ FIND THE BEST PRICES FOR THE Leadtek PX6200 TC TDH @ PRICEGRABBER $$

$$ FIND THE BEST PRICES FOR THE Sapphire X300SE 128MB HyperMemory @ PRICEGRABBER $$

PERFORMANCE – 3DMARK03 & AQUAMARK3


There is no need for introduction to Futuremark’s 3DMark03 benchmarking application. A quick look at these results shows the Leadtek TurboCache outperform the Sapphire HyperMemory card.

The AquaMark3 benchmark is based on an actual game engine, and it can really stress even the most modern cards. Higher end cards don’t score very high in this benchmark with 4xAA and 8xAF on so I disabled both AA (anti-aliasing) and AF (anisotropic filtering) for these less capable cards, but I left the quality setting at High. Once again, the TurboCache card proves superior to the HyperMemory solution.

$$ FIND THE BEST PRICES FOR THE Leadtek PX6200 TC TDH @ PRICEGRABBER $$

$$ FIND THE BEST PRICES FOR THE Sapphire X300SE 128MB HyperMemory @ PRICEGRABBER $$

PERFORMANCE – HALF-LIFE 2


To benchmark Half-Life 2, I used the HL2 benchmark utility created by HardwareOC. I used the included HOC d3c17 map demo and Guru3d demo5 for testing. The X300SE HyperMemory card fires back this round and beats up on the 6200 TurboCache card.

$$ FIND THE BEST PRICES FOR THE Leadtek PX6200 TC TDH @ PRICEGRABBER $$

$$ FIND THE BEST PRICES FOR THE Sapphire X300SE 128MB HyperMemory @ PRICEGRABBER $$

PERFORMANCE – DOOM 3


Doom 3′s impressive graphics can really test cards, which means that low-end cards really struggle at typical playing resolutions and detail levels. That is why I turned the quality level down to medium and turned off AA. I also disabled the high quality effects for the first setting and then disabled all effects in the last two. It is worth noting that your game experience would be far from optimal if you really chose to lower your settings this much. It was quite easy to see the negative impact on visuals. Here the Leadtek TurboCache card goes back to beating up on the Sapphire HyperMemory offering.

$$ FIND THE BEST PRICES FOR THE Leadtek PX6200 TC TDH @ PRICEGRABBER $$

$$ FIND THE BEST PRICES FOR THE Sapphire X300SE 128MB HyperMemory @ PRICEGRABBER $$

PERFORMANCE – X2: THE THREAT


This demo is based on a game, and that is X2: The Threat of course. The Rolling Demo renders a bunch of different game scenes and reports scores for each scene and an average score in frames per second (FPS). The chart below just shows the average. This benchmark was run with bumpmaps, shadows and anti-aliasing set to “On” or “Off” as indicated in the application and with “Application Preference” set in the driver control panel.

$$ FIND THE BEST PRICES FOR THE Leadtek PX6200 TC TDH @ PRICEGRABBER $$

$$ FIND THE BEST PRICES FOR THE Sapphire X300SE 128MB HyperMemory @ PRICEGRABBER $$

CONCLUSION


Based on the performance seen here, I can’t help but feel that same nagging lack of real performance that you get from onboard graphics on motherboards. I would urge anyone really wanting to do any gaming to strongly consider saving up a little more money and finding a good deal on something like a Sapphire X700 or Leadtek 6600 level card (or whatever brand suits your fancy). Currently, the cards tested in this review can be found for about $70 for the Leadtek PX6200 TC TDH supporting 256MB and about $55 for the Saphire X300SE 128MB HyperMemory.

If you are just wanting a basic video card and don’t really plan to play any modern or graphics-intensive games, then either card would work fine for you. Go with the Sapphire if you want the cheapest you can find; go with the Leadtek if you want generally better performance and a better bundle and don’t mind paying more. If you are interested in HyperMemory and/or TurboCache, keep an eye on the headlines to see what ATI and NVIDIA come up with next and be sure to check out other reviews around the WWW to see comparisons of the different configurations of these two competing technologies.


Optimization WordPress Plugins & Solutions by W3 EDGE